AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals53/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 395 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 395 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Softdocs is a B2B document management and process automation SaaS with strong primary-market proof on G2 (24 reviews, 4.7★). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion/evaluation crawlability: Softdocs appears to rely on demo/contact flows for key buyer questions, and there are no clearly indexed first-party comparison pages for “How does Softdocs compare to Laserfiche?” and “How does Softdocs compare to Hyland OnBase?”. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and index first-party, brand-led comparison pages for Laserfiche and Hyland OnBase that include evaluation blocks and pricing-model clarity.
Based on audit of softdocs.com · Oct 8, 2026