AI Visibility
measured24/100
Emerging · in Graphic Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
20
across 173 prompts
AI Share of Voice
20%
across 173 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Graphic Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Snappa is visible in
1Executive summary
Snappa is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 presence (40 reviews, 4.6/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Snappa vs Canva). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for pricing/integrations/alternatives) so AI can cite Snappa directly for “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” prompts without relying as much on third-party review sites.
Based on audit of snappa.com · Oct 2, 2026