AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Community Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
82
across 46 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 30 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Community Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Skool is likely to be cited for discovery and “how to use” style queries, but it is weak for evaluation/conversion queries where AI expects first-party comparison and B2B review/analyst citations. The single highest-ROI fix is to create/ship crawlable first-party evaluation content (especially “[Skool] vs [Competitor]” pages and an FAQPage targeting pricing/integrations) and ensure it’s indexed by AI crawlers.
Based on audit of skool.com · Aug 29, 2026