AI Visibility
measured39/100
Emerging · in Commerce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
30
across 687 prompts
AI Share of Voice
30%
across 687 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Commerce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Signifyd is visible in
1Executive summary
Signifyd is strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (349 reviews on its seller page) and has multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Signifyd vs Cybersource). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage queries: the pricing page is publicly crawlable but does not show tiered prices (custom quote / usage-based with no numbers), which limits how often AI can answer “how much” questions from Signifyd itself.
Based on audit of signifyd.com · Oct 7, 2026