[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sentry
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

26

across 1537 prompts

AI Share of Voice

27%

across 1516 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Error Tracking · of 43

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1067 category
Cited33%350/1067
Share of voice28%avg
Engine consensus54%of engines
Competitors12.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited13%2/15
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sentry is visible in

6
  • Error Tracking1 of 43→
  • Developer Tools9 of 465→
  • Observability & APM9 of 102→
  • IT & Service Management87 of 305→
  • AI Debuggersnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Sentry is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best application monitoring and error tracking software?" and "What is the best application monitoring and error tracking software for production error tracking and debugging?" because it has strong G2 social proof (162 reviews, 4.5★) and appears on Gartner Peer Insights. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, crawlable comparison and pricing surfaces ("How does Sentry compare to Datadog?", "How does Sentry compare to New Relic?", and "How much does Sentry cost?") so AI engines can cite Sentry pages instead of relying on third-party comparison content.

Based on audit of sentry.io · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy