[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Secureframe
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

44

across 1142 prompts

AI Share of Voice

44%

across 1122 prompts

Category Visibility

#54

in Cloud Security · of 112

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
783 category
Cited56%435/783
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors7.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited85%11/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited40%2/5
Share of voice40%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Secureframe is visible in

4
  • Compliance Automation3 of 131→
  • Security53 of 107→
  • Cloud Security54 of 112→
  • Vulnerability Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Secureframe is highly likely to be cited for category and evaluation prompts because it has strong G2 presence (792 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison pages like “Secureframe vs. Vanta” and “Secureframe vs. Drata.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, schema-backed evaluation content for pricing and “best for SOC 2 readiness and evidence collection” queries—your pricing page exists but appears to be thin/insufficient for AI pricing extraction, which can block direct-answer eligibility for “How much does Secureframe cost?”

Based on audit of secureframe.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy