AI Visibility
measured55/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
28
across 170 prompts
AI Share of Voice
24%
across 146 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Intelligence
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Seamless.AI is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 authority (5310 reviews, 4.4★ per your pre-verified context) and it publishes first-party comparison content like “Apollo IO vs Seamless AI” and “Lusha vs Seamless.AI”. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured data and technical crawlability for evaluation pages (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + SSR confirmation), because current web signals show pricing is crawlable but schema/LLM crawl directives were not discoverable via search.
Based on audit of seamless.ai · Apr 1, 2026