AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in HR
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
44
across 142 prompts
AI Share of Voice
44%
across 142 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in HR
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sapling is visible in
3Executive summary
Sapling is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage comparison queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., Grammarly vs. Sapling, LanguageTool vs. Sapling) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers ($0/$25 and team starts at 10 seats, $15/seat/month). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-focused structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + Organization sameAs) and ensure Technical AEO crawlability signals (robots.txt + sitemap coverage) are fully accessible to AI crawlers.
Based on audit of sapling.ai · Sep 21, 2026