AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in Sales Engagement
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 330 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 307 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Engagement
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Saleshandy is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like “How does Saleshandy compare to Apollo.io?” because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., “Saleshandy vs Apollo.io” and “Saleshandy vs Lemlist”) and a publicly accessible pricing page with explicit tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregate rating) and ensure technical crawlability signals (robots.txt/llms.txt) are explicitly aligned for AI crawlers—this is currently the biggest uncertainty gap versus top-tier B2B SaaS citation readiness.
Based on audit of saleshandy.com · Apr 1, 2026