AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Finance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 299 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 299 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Finance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) is visible in
2Executive summary
Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) is already strong for AI citation on evaluation and conversion queries because pricing is publicly crawlable with specific tiers (e.g., $11.99 and $14.99 per active user/month billed annually) and first-party comparison content exists (e.g., /alternative and multiple vs-style pages). The biggest remaining risk is Platform Optimization/Structured Data: there is no evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating structured data, which can reduce eligibility for Google AI Overviews and other rich AI answers for prompts like "How does Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) compare to SAP Concur?" and "How much does Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) cost?".
Based on audit of fylehq.com · Jun 6, 2026