[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle)
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

4

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 301 prompts

AI Share of Voice

4%

across 301 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
178 category
Cited7%12/178
Share of voice3%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors19.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice25%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited50%2/4
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) is visible in

2
  • Spend Management74 of 97→
  • Expense Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) is already strong for AI citation on evaluation and conversion queries because pricing is publicly crawlable with specific tiers (e.g., $11.99 and $14.99 per active user/month billed annually) and first-party comparison content exists (e.g., /alternative and multiple vs-style pages). The biggest remaining risk is Platform Optimization/Structured Data: there is no evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating structured data, which can reduce eligibility for Google AI Overviews and other rich AI answers for prompts like "How does Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) compare to SAP Concur?" and "How much does Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) cost?".

Based on audit of fylehq.com · Jun 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy