AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in Transportation Management (TMS)
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
33
across 183 prompts
AI Share of Voice
33%
across 183 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Transportation Management (TMS)
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Routific is visible in
1Executive summary
Routific is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 presence (47 reviews, 4.8/5) and high Capterra volume (144 reviews, 4.9/5). The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage “Routific pricing” and evaluation “Routific vs competitor” queries when first-party pricing/comparison content is not reliably crawlable/structured for AI—highest ROI fix is to ensure routific.com/pricing and key comparison pages are SSR-crawlable and backed by B2B schema (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Product+Offer).
Based on audit of routific.com · Oct 9, 2026