AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Graphic Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 383 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 383 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Graphic Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
RelayThat has strong B2B citation inputs from G2 (32 reviews, 4.1★) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers ($15/user Pro, $25/user Pro+ Plus, Enterprise contact). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison queries (e.g., "How does RelayThat compare to Canva?"), because first-party "RelayThat vs Canva/Semrush/RELAYTO AI/Snagit/Simplified" pages were not found in live search—so AI must rely on third-party comparisons instead of citing RelayThat directly.
Based on audit of relaythat.com · Sep 1, 2026