AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in CRM
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
39
across 290 prompts
AI Share of Voice
39%
across 290 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Rate
1/206
Category Discovery Prompts
How AI Visibility breaks down
in CRM
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Relate is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Relate surfaces in 1/206 CRM discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 205 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Relate.us is a B2B meeting intelligence/coaching SaaS with strong AI citation inputs from G2 (21 reviews, 4.7/5) and publicly crawlable tiered pricing ($16 and $33 per user/month billed annually, plus a free plan). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: while Relate has first-party “Relate vs Gong” and “Relate vs Fireflies.ai” pages, there’s no evidence (from crawlable signals) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and no accessible llms.txt/robots.txt verification, which can suppress Google AI Overviews and other LLM shortlists.
Based on audit of relate.us · Oct 4, 2026