[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Ramp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

57

across 311 prompts

AI Share of Voice

62%

across 290 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Spend Management · of 97

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
175 brand-level
Cited95%166/175
Share of voice66%avg
Engine consensus69%of engines
Competitors33.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited13%2/15
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Ramp is visible in

2
  • Expense Management1 of 108→
  • Spend Management2 of 97→

Executive summary

Ramp is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts like “What is the best spend management software?” and “How does Ramp compare to Brex?” because it has strong G2 presence (2330 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., /versus/brex, /versus/expensify, /versus/bill-com). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization) and Technical AEO verification (SSR + schema visibility), since current web signals show limited evidence of schema being crawlable/citable.

Based on audit of ramp.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy