AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in AI Applications
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
89
across 29 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 20 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Applications
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Predis.ai is already strongly citable for evaluation and conversion queries because it has 106 G2 reviews at 4.7★ and a publicly accessible pricing page with specific tiers (Core/Rise/Enterprise+). The biggest AI-citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO: the site content is crawlable, but there’s no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization JSON-LD, which limits how reliably AI engines can extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” for high-intent prompts.
Based on audit of predis.ai · Oct 4, 2026