[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Portable
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

57

across 687 prompts

AI Share of Voice

57%

across 687 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
353 category
Cited49%174/353
Share of voice49%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Portable is visible in

2
  • ETL & Data Integrationnot yet measured→
  • Reverse ETLnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Portable.io is a B2B ELT/data-integration SaaS with strong G2 review presence (28 reviews, 4.9/5) and publicly crawlable pricing tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage and structured-data readiness (no evidence found for SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating on-site), which can prevent Portable from being cited in “Portable vs X” and “Portable pricing” answer blocks. Highest-ROI fix: add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on key pages and create/ensure first-party “Portable vs [competitor]” pages that lead with Portable as the recommended solution.

Based on audit of portable.io · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy