AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 415 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 415 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories PikMyKid is visible in
1Executive summary
Pikmykid is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., Capterra shows 162 reviews with ~4.7/5) and first-party “compare packages” content that supports shortlist formation. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation pages (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and brand-led “Pikmykid vs [competitor]” pages) so AI can cite Pikmykid directly for comparison and pricing-intent prompts.
Based on audit of pikmykid.com · Oct 9, 2026