AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in Graphic Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 168 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 168 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Graphic Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Photopea is likely to be cited by AI engines for “best free photo editor / Photoshop alternative” style queries, supported by strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 4.6/5 with 21 reviews and Capterra 4.5 with 114 reviews). The biggest citation risk is that Photopea’s own site appears to be optimized more for end-user learning than for B2B-style evaluation/citation patterns (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage for evaluation queries and crawlable pricing/comparison surfaces). Highest-ROI fix: add/verify crawlable structured data and evaluation-focused pages (FAQPage + SoftwareApplication + pricing/plan details) that AI can quote directly.
Based on audit of photopea.com · Oct 7, 2026