AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in PDF Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 393 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 393 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in PDF Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories pdfFiller is visible in
3Executive summary
pdfFiller is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 915 G2 reviews) and publicly visible pricing/plan pages. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, brand-led evaluation content for high-intent comparison queries (e.g., “pdfFiller vs X” pages that are clearly indexed and not competitor-vs-competitor framed).
Based on audit of pdffiller.com · Jun 8, 2026