[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/pdfFiller
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 393 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 393 prompts

Category Visibility

#13

in PDF Tools · of 56

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
197 brand-level
Cited6%11/197
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors23.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories pdfFiller is visible in

3
  • PDF Tools13 of 56→
  • Document Generationnot yet measured→
  • eSignaturenot yet measured→

Executive summary

pdfFiller is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 915 G2 reviews) and publicly visible pricing/plan pages. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, brand-led evaluation content for high-intent comparison queries (e.g., “pdfFiller vs X” pages that are clearly indexed and not competitor-vs-competitor framed).

Based on audit of pdffiller.com · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy