AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Project Management Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 321 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 321 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Project Management Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Paymo is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (594 reviews) and has publicly crawlable, tiered pricing (Solo/Plus/Pro with per-user/month pricing). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “brand + comparison” queries where first-party “[Paymo] vs [competitor]” pages and structured SoftwareApplication/FAQ schema are missing or not discoverable to crawlers.
Based on audit of paymoapp.com · Jun 7, 2026