AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Risk, Compliance & GRC
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 20 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 20 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Risk, Compliance & GRC
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Paubox is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large, highly rated G2 presence (636 reviews, 4.9/5, Grid leader) and first-party pricing that appears crawlable. The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation accuracy for pricing/plan queries and structured evaluation queries (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLM-facing structured Q&A), because we did not confirm SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/llms.txt/robots.txt AI-bot allowances via live checks.
Based on audit of paubox.com · Sep 1, 2026