AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 28 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 28 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Paperpile is visible in
1Executive summary
Paperpile is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page with explicit tiers ($4.15/mo Regular, $5.75/mo Expert, and Enterprise quote) and a strong G2 presence (26 reviews). The biggest citation risk is conversion/evaluation “comparison” intent: Paperpile has first-party comparison-style content (e.g., “Zotero vs Paperpile”), but there’s no clear evidence of a broad, indexed “[Paperpile] vs [Competitor]” comparison hub that AI can reliably use for shortlist answers.
Based on audit of paperpile.com · Oct 5, 2026