AI Visibility
measured68/100
Frequently Cited · in Subscription Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
43
across 645 prompts
AI Share of Voice
43%
across 637 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Subscription Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Paddle is visible in
4Executive summary
Paddle is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for Merchant of Record evaluation queries because it has strong G2 presence (378 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party evaluation content including a dedicated pricing page and a first-party “Paddle vs Chargebee” comparison page. The biggest remaining citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO completeness (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage for evaluation prompts) and ensuring comparison coverage extends to the full competitor set (Chargebee, Recurly, FastSpring, Cleverbridge, Zuora) with brand-led, self-contained pages.
Based on audit of paddle.com · Oct 11, 2026