AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in Voice AI
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 465 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 448 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Voice AI
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Otter.ai is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party B2B review presence (e.g., 504 G2 reviews) and an accessible, tiered pricing page with explicit per-user/month amounts. The biggest remaining citation risk is conversion-stage “Otter.ai vs competitor” and “Otter.ai pricing” being limited by missing/uncertain first-party structured comparison + SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema coverage.
Based on audit of otter.ai · Aug 29, 2026