AI Visibility
measured17/100
Emerging · in Contact Center
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 299 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 288 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Contact Center
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Ooma is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a crawlable, tiered pricing page (e.g., $19.95/$24.95/$29.95 per user per month) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Ooma Office vs. Nextiva). The biggest risk is that several high-intent comparison prompts (Ooma vs Quo/GoTo Connect/RingEX/Dialpad Connect) and structured-data requirements (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) are not clearly discoverable/crawlable via search, which can prevent Ooma from being selected in “best/alternatives” shortlists.
Based on audit of ooma.com · Aug 30, 2026