AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 178 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 178 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories On Plan is visible in
1Executive summary
Onplan.co is likely not being cited by AI engines for the highest-intent evaluation queries because its first-party site content appears to be project-controls/blog oriented rather than a crawlable budgeting & forecasting SaaS product surface. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation assets (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + brand-led “[On Plan] vs Vena” and “[On Plan] vs Planful” pages) and a crawlable pricing page that AI can read.
Based on audit of onplan.co · Oct 6, 2026