[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/OnPage
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

8

across 309 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 309 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
172 category
Cited2%3/172
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories OnPage is visible in

2
  • Contact Centernot yet measured→
  • Customer Successnot yet measured→

Executive summary

OnPage is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “OnPage vs [competitor]” and “OnPage pricing” because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., OnPage vs Pagers vs Email) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data (and ensure llms.txt/robots.txt AI-crawler access), because current web signals show pricing/comparison crawlability but no confirmed schema/AI-crawler directives.

Based on audit of onpage.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy