AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
OneCal is a B2B calendar sync + scheduling links SaaS with strong G2 traction (97 reviews, 4.7★) and solid first-party crawlable pricing and comparison content. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage query coverage: several high-intent comparison prompts (e.g., "How does OneCal compare to Calendly?" and "How does OneCal compare to Google Workspace?") are likely not supported by a dedicated, indexed first-party "OneCal vs <competitor>" page structure for every competitor, so AI engines may fall back to third-party sources.
Based on audit of onecal.io · Oct 4, 2026