AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Forms & Surveys
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
66
across 17 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 1 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Forms & Surveys
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Ninja Forms is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “Ninja Forms reviews” and “Ninja Forms pricing” because it has a public pricing page with explicit tiers and is present on major review platforms (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “Ninja Forms vs [competitor]” and “alternatives to Ninja Forms” because first-party comparison coverage exists but is not clearly structured as a dedicated, crawl-optimized evaluation surface (and G2 review volume appears low). Highest-ROI fix: add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages and ensure they are crawlable/SSR with evaluation-focused structure (FAQ + side-by-side tables) so AI can cite Ninja Forms directly for vs/alternatives prompts.
Based on audit of ninjaforms.com · Aug 29, 2026