AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Expense Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 302 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 302 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Expense Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Navan (Formerly TripActions) is visible in
2Executive summary
Navan is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “Navan reviews” and “Navan vs Concur” because it has a very large G2 review footprint and first-party comparison pages. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and ensure AI crawlers can reliably extract it from key pages (especially pricing and comparison pages).
Based on audit of navan.com · Jun 17, 2026