[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Mulesoft
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

68

across 631 prompts

AI Share of Voice

69%

across 610 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in API Management · of 100

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
377 category
Cited81%304/377
Share of voice69%avg
Engine consensus59%of engines
Competitors10.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited67%8/12
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited89%8/9
Share of voice89%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Mulesoft is visible in

3
  • API Management3 of 100→
  • ETL & Data Integration8 of 214→
  • API Design Toolsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

MuleSoft is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best iPaaS software?" and "What is the best iPaaS software for enterprise integration and API-led connectivity?" because it has strong G2 presence (714 reviews, 4.5★) and first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., "MuleSoft vs. Boomi" and "MuleSoft vs. Workato"). The single highest-ROI fix is to expand first-party comparison coverage to the remaining named competitors ("How does MuleSoft compare to Informatica?", "...Jitterbit?", "...IBM App Connect?") and ensure each page is indexed with self-contained evaluation blocks.

Based on audit of mulesoft.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy