AI Visibility
measured60/100
Frequently Cited · in API Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
76
across 827 prompts
AI Share of Voice
76%
across 806 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in API Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Mulesoft is visible in
3Executive summary
MuleSoft is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best iPaaS software?" and "What is the best iPaaS software for enterprise integration and API-led connectivity?" because it has strong G2 presence (714 reviews, 4.5★) and first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., "MuleSoft vs. Boomi" and "MuleSoft vs. Workato"). The single highest-ROI fix is to expand first-party comparison coverage to the remaining named competitors ("How does MuleSoft compare to Informatica?", "...Jitterbit?", "...IBM App Connect?") and ensure each page is indexed with self-contained evaluation blocks.
Based on audit of mulesoft.com · Apr 2, 2026