AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Product Analytics
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 561 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 561 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Product Analytics
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Mouseflow is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage comparison queries because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., “Mouseflow vs Hotjar”) and public pricing. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data coverage (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Offer+Product) so Google AI Overviews and other LLMs can reliably extract pricing, evaluation criteria, and “vs” answers from mouseflow.com itself.
Based on audit of mouseflow.com · Oct 5, 2026