[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Motion
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook

Other products from Motion

Motion54
Claim profile →

AEO Score

8

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

80

across 766 prompts

AI Share of Voice

80%

across 766 prompts

Critical Issues

7

critical + high

Shortlist Position

6/80

Not Visible · Scheduling Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
640 category
Cited89%567/640
Share of voice88%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited50%2/4
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice59%avg
Engine consensus58%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Motion is visible in

1
  • Scheduling & Calendarnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Motion surfaces in 6/80 Scheduling discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 74 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Motion →

Executive summary

usemotion.com (Motion) has meaningful B2B citation signals via G2 (157 reviews) and strong LinkedIn entity presence, but it is missing key evaluation-stage surfaces needed for AI to recommend it for scheduling coordination use cases. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable pages that directly answer the highest-value discovery gaps (team training coordination, real-time availability, time-zone coordination, client appointment scheduling, recurring events) with structured FAQ blocks and clear “who it’s for” sections.

Based on audit of usemotion.com · May 23, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy