AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
morgen.so is likely to be cited for consumer/prosumer productivity and calendar/time-blocking queries (e.g., “Morgen pricing”, “Motion vs Morgen”, “alternatives”), but it’s at risk for B2B-style evaluation queries because it lacks visible enterprise review/analyst signals (no confirmed G2/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights presence from live search). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable, structured evaluation content (FAQPage + clear “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” blocks) and strengthen third-party citation sources beyond app-store/Trustpilot-style coverage.
Based on audit of morgen.so · Aug 31, 2026