AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 173 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 173 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Monster is visible in
1Executive summary
Monster.com is not a B2B SaaS vendor in the way the framework expects; it’s primarily a job board/recruiting marketplace, so AI citation tends to come from general web coverage and review sites rather than G2/Capterra-style SaaS evaluation. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation/conversion queries that expect crawlable, structured “product” pages (especially pricing/FAQ-style Q&A); the highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, answer-first employer pages (pricing + “how it works” + FAQs) with consistent entity signals.
Based on audit of monster.com · Oct 5, 2026