[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Mindtickle
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

31

across 432 prompts

AI Share of Voice

30%

across 410 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
285 category
Cited43%123/285
Share of voice39%avg
Engine consensus49%of engines
Competitors8.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited58%7/12
Share of voice58%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Mindtickle is visible in

3
  • Learning Management32 of 67→
  • Revenue Intelligencenot yet measured→
  • Sales Engagementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

mindtickle.com is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong G2 presence (2,223+ reviews, 4.7★) and first-party competitor comparison pages like “Mindtickle vs Highspot” and “Mindtickle vs Seismic.” The single highest-ROI fix is to improve crawlable pricing + structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) so AI engines can answer “How much does Mindtickle cost?” and “Is Mindtickle worth it for mid-market and enterprise companies?” directly from Mindtickle pages rather than falling back to third parties.

Based on audit of mindtickle.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy