AI Visibility
measured52/100
Frequently Cited · in Security
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
50
across 428 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 409 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Rate
219/659
Category Discovery Prompts
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Security
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Mimecast surfaces in 219/659 Security discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 440 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Mimecast is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (317 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party comparison content like “Replace Proofpoint with Mimecast.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, schema-backed evaluation surfaces for pricing and “vs” queries (e.g., ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and that pricing is fully crawlable with tier/price data), because those are the most common blockers for AI engines answering “How much does Mimecast cost?” and “How does Mimecast compare to Microsoft Defender for Office 365?”
Based on audit of mimecast.com · Apr 2, 2026