AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 309 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 309 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories MetaMask is visible in
2Executive summary
MetaMask is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best cryptocurrency wallet software?" and DeFi/dApp fit because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 43 reviews at 4.4★) and frequent first-party comparison-style content. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, crawlable evaluation pages that directly answer comparison and pricing prompts (especially "How does MetaMask compare to Zengo Wallet?" / "How much does MetaMask cost?") with SSR content and schema, so AI engines can cite MetaMask instead of only third parties.
Based on audit of metamask.io · Oct 7, 2026