AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 306 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 306 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
MeisterTask is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., /pages/compare/*) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-user tiers (€0/€13/€24/custom). The biggest citation risk is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and weaker/limited review/analyst signals on the highest-weight enterprise surfaces (e.g., G2 review count/badge details not confirmed in live results; TrustRadius exists with 47 reviews).
Based on audit of meistertask.com · May 6, 2026