AI Visibility
measured37/100
Emerging · in Billing & Invoicing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals13/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
41
across 468 prompts
AI Share of Voice
41%
across 468 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Billing & Invoicing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Maxio is strongly positioned to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial third-party review volume on G2 (829 reviews) and meaningful secondary signals on Capterra (255 reviews) and TrustRadius (66 reviews). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and crawlable comparison/pricing Q&A blocks) so models can cite maxio.com directly for “Maxio vs X” and “Maxio pricing” rather than relying on third-party sources.
Based on audit of maxio.com · May 6, 2026