AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals44/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
32
across 407 prompts
AI Share of Voice
32%
across 407 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Maven is visible in
2Executive summary
Maven.com has meaningful AI-citation potential for evaluation-stage queries because it shows up on G2 with a 4.5/5 rating across 16 reviews, and it has active Reddit and LinkedIn presence. The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation: there is no clearly crawlable, first-party “Maven pricing” page with explicit tiers/prices for the core product, and there are no first-party “[Maven] vs [Competitor]” pages found—so AI engines fall back to third-party lists instead of citing Maven directly.
Based on audit of maven.com · Aug 30, 2026