AI Visibility
measured17/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
16
across 174 prompts
AI Share of Voice
16%
across 174 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories MapleLMS is visible in
1Executive summary
MapleLMS is a B2B SaaS LMS with meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 18 reviews and TrustRadius has a pricing page), so AI engines can cite it for credibility and shortlist discovery. The biggest citation risk is conversion/evaluation: the site’s own pricing page could not be fetched in this audit, and there is no evidence (from crawlable signals) of first-party comparison pages or SoftwareApplication/FAQ structured data—so AI may avoid citing maplelms.com for “MapleLMS pricing” and “MapleLMS vs competitor” evaluation queries.
Based on audit of maplelms.com · Sep 29, 2026