AI Visibility
measured46/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals13/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
32
across 200 prompts
AI Share of Voice
32%
across 200 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Manatal is a B2B AI recruitment/ATS SaaS and already has meaningful AI-citation inputs from G2 (147 reviews) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., /compare/breezy-hr). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: despite having comparison pages and public pricing tiers, there’s no evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and no clear Gartner/Forrester/IDC enterprise analyst footprint—so AI engines may cite third parties more than Manatal for “best/alternatives” and “vs” queries.
Based on audit of manatal.com · May 7, 2026