AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ManageArtworks is visible in
1Executive summary
ManageArtworks is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 profile with 19 reviews and a 4.4/5 rating, plus a public pricing page with tiered plans. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing” and evaluation “vs/alternatives” queries where AI needs crawlable, structured pages (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and first-party comparison content; the site has alternatives coverage via G2/Capterra but no clear first-party “[ManageArtworks] vs [Competitor]” pages found.
Based on audit of manageartworks.com · Sep 2, 2026