AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Email Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 499 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 499 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Developer Tools Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Email Marketing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Mailtrap is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Mailtrap surfaces in 0/80 Developer Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Mailtrap is strongly positioned for evaluation-stage AI answers because it has a high-signal G2 presence (73 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison pages like “Mailtrap VS SendGrid” and “Mailtrap VS Mailgun.” The biggest remaining AI-citation risk is conversion-stage structured extraction: the site’s pricing is crawlable and specific, but SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data signals were not found in live checks, limiting rich AI Overviews eligibility for evaluation queries.
Based on audit of mailtrap.io · May 20, 2026