[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Mailtrap
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

3

across 500 prompts

AI Share of Voice

3%

across 500 prompts

Category Visibility

#34

in Email Marketing · of 91

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Developer Tools Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
320 category
Cited1%4/320
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors17.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Mailtrap is visible in

2
  • Email Marketing35 of 91→
  • Developer Toolsnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Mailtrap surfaces in 0/80 Developer Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Mailtrap →

Executive summary

Mailtrap is strongly positioned for evaluation-stage AI answers because it has a high-signal G2 presence (73 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison pages like “Mailtrap VS SendGrid” and “Mailtrap VS Mailgun.” The biggest remaining AI-citation risk is conversion-stage structured extraction: the site’s pricing is crawlable and specific, but SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data signals were not found in live checks, limiting rich AI Overviews eligibility for evaluation queries.

Based on audit of mailtrap.io · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy