AI Visibility
measured37/100
Emerging · in Digital Advertising
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
21
across 328 prompts
AI Share of Voice
21%
across 328 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Advertising
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Madgicx has strong B2B review authority on G2 (226 reviews, 4.6★) which supports “best campaign management software” style shortlists, but first-party evaluation surfaces are weak for AI (no clearly indexable “[Madgicx] vs AdRoll/Smartly/HubSpot Marketing Hub/Triple Whale/AdEspresso by Hootsuite” pages found). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and SSR-index dedicated, brand-led comparison pages and pair them with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can cite Madgicx directly for evaluation and pricing prompts.
Based on audit of madgicx.com · May 7, 2026