[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Madgicx
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

6

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

14

across 304 prompts

AI Share of Voice

14%

across 304 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
177 category
Cited14%25/177
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus42%of engines
Competitors6.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Madgicx is visible in

2
  • Digital Advertisingnot yet measured→
  • Marketing Analyticsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Madgicx has strong B2B review authority on G2 (226 reviews, 4.6★) which supports “best campaign management software” style shortlists, but first-party evaluation surfaces are weak for AI (no clearly indexable “[Madgicx] vs AdRoll/Smartly/HubSpot Marketing Hub/Triple Whale/AdEspresso by Hootsuite” pages found). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and SSR-index dedicated, brand-led comparison pages and pair them with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can cite Madgicx directly for evaluation and pricing prompts.

Based on audit of madgicx.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy