AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Document Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 334 prompts
AI Share of Voice
1%
across 313 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Document Collaboration
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories M Files is visible in
2Executive summary
m-files.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (279 reviews, 4.4★) and credible enterprise signals (Gartner Peer Insights pages and press coverage). The biggest citation risk is prompt patterns that require first-party evaluation assets—especially direct comparison queries (e.g., “How does M-Files compare to Microsoft SharePoint?”) and “How much does M-Files cost?”—because pricing appears not to be transparently published on the site and first-party vs-competitor pages were not found for the exact competitor set.
Based on audit of m-files.com · Apr 2, 2026