AI Visibility
measured66/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
64
across 290 prompts
AI Share of Voice
66%
across 272 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Intelligence
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Lusha is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like “What is the best sales intelligence software?” and “What are the best alternatives to Lusha?” because it has strong third-party authority (G2: 1621 reviews, 4.3★) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., “Lusha vs ZoomInfo” and “Lusha vs Apollo.io” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, schema-rich evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for the exact comparison/pricing prompts) and ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite “How much does Lusha cost?” directly from lusha.com.
Based on audit of lusha.com · Apr 1, 2026