AI Visibility
measured40/100
Frequently Cited · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals39/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 1177 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 1177 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Logos is visible in
2Executive summary
logos.com is not showing strong AI-citation readiness for “best [category]” and “alternatives to [category]” style prompts because it lacks clear, crawlable first-party evaluation content (notably no discoverable first-party comparison pages found in live search). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, structured evaluation pages (FAQ + comparison-style content) that directly answer common “what is it / who is it for / pricing / alternatives” questions in a way AI engines can quote.
Based on audit of logos.com · Sep 1, 2026