AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Legal Tech
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
22
across 153 prompts
AI Share of Voice
22%
across 153 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Legal Tech
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Logikcull is visible in
1Executive summary
Logikcull is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 shows 514+ reviews at ~4.7/5) and active branded comparison pages (e.g., Logikcull vs Everlaw, vs GovQA). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization sameAs) and Technical AEO crawl signals (robots.txt/llms.txt verification), because current evidence suggests schema presence is not easily discoverable by search and AI engines may struggle to extract evaluation-ready facts from first-party pages.
Based on audit of logikcull.com · Oct 3, 2026